Posted by Kitty Dunn on March 3, 2010
The Academy Awards will be handed out Sunday night, and it seems a lot of folks are betting on The Hurt Locker to win. That could very well be. I really have no opinion, because I’ve only seen on of the nominated pictures (and it wasn’t even Avatar). But I can tell you which were the three worst pictures to win that coveted Best Picture Oscar trophy.
At least in my opinion.
#3: The English Patient (1996). I tried watching this movie on DVD, and while it has some beautiful cinematography, it is BORING. In case you missed this movie, it stars Juliette Binoche as a nurse taking care of a critically burned man in an abandoned monastery. As I recall it had a bunch of soap opera type stuff about affairs…and..what am I saying? I fast forwarded through a bunch of it and then followed what the little sticker said, “be kind, rewind.”
#2 Out of Africa (1985)This is another scenery plus boring dialog soap opera movie. I went to this in the theatre and could not wait to leave. It tells the story of author Isak Dineson. And while I have nothing against authors, I have a lot against this movie. It did star two great actors–Meryl Streep and Robert Redford, but even they could not help this thing. I also remember that Redford got paid $6 million dollars for this movie and he was hardly even in it, and Streep got $1 million and was in every scene and had to do an accent. I guess I can hate this movie on the grounds of equal rights for women (even overpaid actors).
#1 Chariots of Fire (1981). This is my all time most hated Best Oscar Winning Movie of All Time. I hate hate hate this movie. First of all, there are no chariots. There is also no fire. FALSE ADVERTISING! The big excitement is a bunch of guys running on a beach with that Vangelis song playing in the background. Then there’s a bunch of talking in English accents. I went to this movie with my friend Karla, and she also hated it. (So if that’s not evidence I don’t know what is!)
All you ever have to see of Chariots of Fire:
CONCLUSION: When a movie is all about pretty scenery and stunning cinematography, it is not a movie. It is a window. If you like that you should travel and experience it…maybe send some postcards to your friends (or better yet, SLIDES!). If you want to make a movie, please have a story in mind first. Thank you.

Ed Johnson









It tells the story of a 14 year old, his dysfunctional family, a car in the living room, a burned out trailer and unrequited love. But that statement does NOT give justice to this hysterical story.
advice? Skip the first two and see Up in the Air three times.
It’s Complicated really isn’t complicated at all. A family of self-satisfied over achievers struggles with their identity in ways that are just kind of annoying. I think I was supposed to like all these characters, but by the end of the movie I wanted them all to just shut up already. Even Steve Martin, who I really like, was terrible in a terrible role. And Alec Baldwin proved that his “30 Rock” character only works for 22 minutes at at time on the small screen. But if you’re upper middle class and middle aged and want confirmation that you’re still cool and attractive this is the movie for you. Just don’t look in the mirror.
Which brings me to Up in the Air, which is really worth seeing. The characters are interesting and fresh, the acting is terrific and there isn’t a clunky or cliched line in the entire movie. And it has an ambiguous message, if it’s got one at all. Just like life.










The other night I saw “The Reader”. The best movies give you something to talk about afterwards over a drink and this one would have done just that if one of my companions didn’t have to get up at four the next morning to do some lame radio show. Nonetheless, even without that guy, Dianne and I, even days later, still talk about it.